New UGA research challenges fundamental precept of organic chemistry

July 10, 2014

Alan Flurry

Alan Flurry

Director of Communications, Franklin College

Recent and archived articles by Alan Flurry

Franklin College of Arts and Sciences
Work: 706-542-3331

Henry F. Schaefer

Henry Schaefer

Office of Research
Paul von Rague Schleyer

Paul von Rague Schleyer

Department of Chemistry
Chemistry, Department ofFranklin College of Arts and Sciences

Related Sites

Athens, Ga. - A family of millions of known chemical compounds called "aromatics" or "arenes" and their products, including a great number of medicines, plastics and synthetic fibers, are characterized by their regular arrangement of ring atoms instead of alternating single and double bonds. A new study published by researchers in the University of Georgia Franklin College of Arts and Sciences department of chemistry posits a different fundamental mechanism for the way these compounds react to replace atoms.

The study, "Arenium ions are not obligatory intermediates in electrophilic aromatic substitution," was published June 27 in the early online edition of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Benzene, the "aromatic" prototype, was discovered by Michael Faraday in 1825 as a colorless flammable constituent of the then-used illuminating oil. Along with other aromatics such as naphthalene, or mothballs, it also is found in crude oil.

Aromatics constitute a diverse and widely used chemical family. Employed to make derivatives, benzene consistently ranks among the top 20 chemicals produced annually.

The key chemical reaction giving these derivatives depends on the underlying ring structure. "Electrophilic aromatic substitution" describes the reaction whereby an atom of an aromatic is replaced by another of an "electron-seeking" reagent. This fundamental organic chemical reaction of aromatics is the focus of the paper.

"The electrophile is supposed to attach itself to the aromatic in a first stage to give an ‘intermediate,' from which another group, present at the same site, is then lost in a second stage," said Paul von Ragué Schleyer, Graham Perdue Professor of Chemistry at UGA and one of the study's authors. "Although this putative intermediate has garnered much attention in the literature as a simplification, we find instead that it doesn't exist when the reaction conditions are modeled computationally."

The research team found that a fundamentally different pathway is followed, one that harks back to the "addition-elimination mechanism" that was favored for decades before "electrophilic aromatic substitution" became generally accepted in the 1940s.

"We are excited about the new study," said Henry "Fritz" Schaefer, Graham Perdue Professor of Chemistry and director of the Center for Computational Chemistry at UGA. "It will change the way organic chemists think about some of the most fundamental reaction mechanisms in chemistry."

Other authors on the study are Boris Galabov, Gergana Koleva and Boriana Hadjieva of the department of chemistry and pharmacy, University of Sofia, Bulgaria; and Svetlana Simova of the Institute of Organic Chemistry, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, Bulgaria.

The full study is available at


Filed under:

Media Relations

Executive Director for Media Communications
Greg Trevor

706 / 542-8025
Executive Editor for Media Relations
David Bill

706 / 542-9150
Media Relations Coordinator
Sara Freeland

706 / 542-8077
Media Relations Coordinator for Broadcast
Melissa Jackson

706 / 542-8089

Open Records

Open Records Manager
Bob Taylor

706 / 542-8095